Oh Buggery buggery f**k f**k.
Ah. Read the last post
Then consider the mark.
30.
30!
Bloody 30!
What in the name of steam powered buggery d'ya mean 30?
Thats what the essay got. The same essay which was referred twice before. That was awarded 30 before, though this time had a load more references. The complaint was the rational not clear. Not clear. I wanted pain management in palliative care to compare syringe drivers to subcutaneous morphnine to deterime the superior method as research. I was told to change it to "family involvement" and to use 3 papers from the part 2 essay (which passed).
Then the feedback complaned about the papers [already bouhnd to use as they were part 2] and the rational was "not very clear". Too bloody right it wasn't clear matey, thats generally what happens what you are left bewildered by conflicting information.
Soooooooooooooo...what to do, what to do, what to do.
Have compulsory withdrawl- Hope not
Re-do the work in a different form- Maybe (fingers crossed)
Re-attept (with MITS being in could be allowed)
In response, I have been to the local PCT to see what HCA jobs they have. One. In the community. Which needs a car. I have only this morning applied for the driving theory test. The deadline is tomorrow. Bugger.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment